Forum

Sovereignty Resolutions Defeated in Arkansas and New Hampshire

Posted in Forum on March 4th, 2009 by Rex Stanfield – Comments Off

Today the New Hampshire House of Representatives defeated a resolution in defense of the 9th and 10th Amendments of the Bill of Rights.  And, the Arkansas resolution never even made it to the floor of either chamber for a vote, dying in committee. 

It is up to the people to communicate with their lawmakers  in defense of their sovereignty rights.  Please contact your the congresspeople, senators, and governors in your states to make your wishes known.

See the articles at:

New Hampshire

Arkansas

Some N.H. lawmakers fighting federal stimulus

Posted in Forum on March 4th, 2009 by Rex Stanfield – Be the first to comment

From WVZ Radio in Boston

Concord, N.H. (AP) — A New Hampshire Republican lawmaker is telling the federal government to stay out of state affairs.

The New Hampshire House is scheduled to vote Wednesday on Rep. Daniel Itse’s resolution asserting state sovereignty, or the right to ignore any federal law or policy that violates the Constitution. Itse groups the federal stimulus bill, the No Child Left Behind Act and any new assault rifle ban in that category.

Lawmakers in at least 15 states are sponsoring similar resolutions. Some sponsors have filed them in prior years but say opposition to the stimulus may be spurring a larger movement this year.

Critics say the sponsors are misreading the Constitution. Itse’s supporters are planning a rally on Wednesday before the vote.

Discuss this story here.

SC lawmakers advance states rights measure

Posted in Forum on March 4th, 2009 by Rex Stanfield – Comments Off

The Spartanburg GoUstate.com reports on the sovereignty efforts in South Carolina. See the link to their story here.

New Hampshire House to Vote on Sovereignty This Week

Posted in Forum on March 2nd, 2009 by Rex Stanfield – Be the first to comment

Associated Press, reprinted at Vermont’s WCAX site, reports that the New Hampshire House is scheduled to vote this Wednesday on the sovereignty resolution introduced by Representative Daniel Itse.

Link to story  

Discuss this news item at the Forums

Welcome to State Sovereignty Movement

Posted in Forum on March 1st, 2009 by Rex Stanfield – Be the first to comment

We the People

We in the United States protect our freedoms listed in the Bill of Rights with dogged determination. Freedoms of speech and assembly (1st Amendment), religion (the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment), freedom against unreasonable searches (4th), due process and against self-incrimination (5th), the right to keep and bear arms (2nd), against cruel and unusual punishment (8th), and others carry such impassioned support among the people that we will defend them with our last breath. But there are two basic human freedoms at the end of the list of ten that we have sadly neglected for over 100 years.

The 9th Amendment makes it clear that the powers given to the Federal Government by the constitution are not removed from the people, but rather granted by them. The people retain ultimate sovereignty and the government serves at the pleasure of those it purports to govern. The 10th outlines that the Federal Government is authorized only the very few powers given to the by the Constitution. All other powers not specifically listed as belonging to Washington are reserved to the several state governments.

These two Amendments have been sadly neglected, and the Federal Government has crept into supreme power as a result. In fact, by this year of 2009, the Federal Government has grown into a separate entity with its own self-interests that are unrelated to the interests of the people and the local and state governments they create. Its prime constituency today is its own quest for power and not a desire to serve the needs and desires of the people for reasonable self-government.

The encroachment of the Federal Government permeates all three branches and both major political parties. The solution cannot be a partisan remedy. It is not a red/state issue, a Republican/Democrat struggle; it is not conservative, nor is it liberal. Rather, it predates all those labels, and it became apparent during the First Presidential Administration of George Washington. It is the difference in governmental philosophy that caused Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton to argue bitterly and constantly, while competing for President Washington’s agreement. Most of the original thirteen states would never have ratified the Constitution had it not been for the inclusion in the Bill of Rights of these two liberties.

Washington the capital can no longer be looked to for enforcement of these two freedoms. It is now necessary for the state governments in the 50 capitals to take up the cause of fighting for their own sovereignty. State legislators and governors must be made aware that it is up to them to defend the people’s right to self-government.

This web site is devoted to news and communication related to the movement in all 50 states to declare and enforce state sovereignty.